Validity of Authorization Agreements in International Biotechnology Joint Ventures
Introduction: The Biotechnology Sector is Built on Multinational Partnerships
By 2025, biotechnology companies will:
-
gene therapy,
-
mRNA technologies,
-
CRISPR-based products,
-
cell therapies,
-
development of biosimilar drugs,
-
recombinant protein production,
-
clinical platform technologies
Establishing international partnerships (Joint Ventures – JVs) in areas such as these is now the general norm in the sector.
The most critical legal issue in such partnerships is:
➡️ The jurisdiction agreement (jurisdiction clause) and the validity of the applicable legal provisions in Turkey.
The problem with biotechnology JVs is this:
-
R&D is done in Türkiye
-
The patent is obtained in the USA
-
The clinical trial is conducted in the EU
-
The investment comes through the Cayman Islands
-
The JV headquarters is planned to be located in Switzerland.
This multiple structure a conflict of jurisdiction and applicable law .
1. What is an Authorization Agreement? Why is it vital in biotechnology JVs?
A jurisdiction agreement is a provision that determines which country's courts will have jurisdiction in the event of a dispute between the parties .
In biotechnology JVs, a jurisdiction agreement is vital for managing the following risks:
-
Patent rights and technology transfer
-
Know-how protection
-
Joint invention disputes
-
Misuse of R&D funds
-
Privacy breaches
-
Clinical data ownership
-
Royalty payments
-
Dissolution of the JV or exit from the partnership
Therefore, a "poorly chosen" authorization clause can lead companies to millions of dollars in losses.
2. According to the Turkish Code of Private International Law, can the parties enter into a jurisdiction agreement?
Yes, according to Article 47 of the Private International Law Act:
✔ The parties may enter into a jurisdiction agreement in private law relationships involving a foreign element.
However, there are limits to this:
❗ The power of attorney agreement cannot override public order.
❗ Not applicable to exclusive jurisdictions.
❗ It cannot override mandatory provisions of Turkish law.
These limitations come into play quite frequently in biotechnology JVs.
3. In Biotechnology JVs, Under What Circumstances is a Power of Attorney Agreement Considered Invalid?
A. Patent Registration in Türkiye
Patent invalidation and infringement cases fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Ankara Court of Patent and Trademark Office.
Because:
➡️ "English courts have jurisdiction in all disputes" are invalid for patent disputes.
B. If know-how was used unfairly in Türkiye
This constitutes a tort → Turkish courts have jurisdiction according to Article 35 of the Private International Law Act.
The authorization agreement is unenforceable.
C. If clinical data was collected in Türkiye
Law (KVKK) and health law are mandatory , foreign court jurisdiction is invalid in data protection disputes.
If D. JV is actually operating in Türkiye
Even if the headquarters are located abroad, if the operations are in Türkiye, Turkish courts have jurisdiction.
E. If it contains provisions that are contrary to Turkish public order
For example:
-
Provisions regarding the transfer of invention rights of employees working in Turkish R&D centers
-
Articles that circumvent the Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK)
-
Provisions that grant foreign authorities unlimited access to health data
It is invalid.
4. Most Commonly Used Authorization Requirements in Biotechnology JVs
✔ English Courts (London)
✔ Switzerland (Zurich or Geneva)
✔ Delaware Courts
✔ New York State
✔ ICC / LCIA Arbitration
Many of these conditions may apply to general R&D disputes; however, to the exclusive jurisdictions .
5. Is Arbitration the Most Suitable Solution in Biotechnology JVs?
Partially yes; however, there are limitations.
Arbitration is applicable in the following cases:
✔ Royalty calculation
✔ Breach of contract
✔ JV terminated
✔ Know-how contractual obligations
✔ Technology transfer provisions
✔ Scope of the license
✔ Dispute over shareholding
However, arbitration is invalid:
❌ Patent invalidation
❌ Data disputes related to the Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK)
❌ Clinical trial consent and health data
❌ Product safety issues related to public order
Therefore, biotechnology JV agreements arbitration and exception clauses .
6. Most Common Jurisdiction Disputes in Biotechnology JVs
1) Whose joint invention is it?
Patent law → Exclusive jurisdiction in Türkiye.
2) The dispute over ownership of clinical data
KVKK (Personal Data Protection Law) → Turkish courts get involved.
3) Leaking of know-how
Tort → Place where the damage occurred: Turkish law.
4) Transfer of the biosimilar development platform
Arbitration is possible.
5) Misuse of R&D funds
Arbitration according to the terms of the contract.
6) Disputes regarding the dissolution of the JV
Arbitration or the court specified in the contract.
7. Validity Criteria of Jurisdiction Agreements from the Perspective of Private International Law
✔ The parties must be foreign legal entities or natural persons
✔ The agreement must be international in nature
✔ Authorization must be clear and in writing
✔ It should not contradict public order
✔ Should not cover exclusive jurisdiction areas
✔ Mandatory provisions should not be disregarded
✔ The competent court and arbitration venue must be clearly specified
These criteria must be met in biotechnology JVs.
8. Strategic Recommendations for Companies in Biotechnology Partnerships
✔ Customize the authorization requirements separately on a "subject-by-subject" basis
—> Patent matters are separate from contractual matters.
✔ Leave disputes related to the Personal Data Protection Law to Turkish courts
✔ Clearly specify the location for clinical data collection
✔ Conduct a risk analysis based on the countries where R&D activities are carried out
✔ Write the arbitration clause in detail; the "scope of arbitration" is especially important
✔ Add a mandatory provisions clause (“Turkish mandatory rules apply”)
✔ Prepare a special protocol for the joint meeting
9. Conclusion: Authorization Agreements in Biotechnology JVs are the Most Strategic Area of Private International Law
According to the 2025 plan:
-
In biotechnology JVs, authorization agreements can be made, but they are limited
-
Foreign authorizations are invalid in the areas of patents, clinical data, GDPR, and public order
-
Arbitration is suitable for most commercial disputes, but it is not absolute
-
Contracts must include a subject-based authorization system
-
Mandatory provisions take precedence over enabling provisions
Therefore, it is a critical success factor for biotechnology companies to design the jurisdiction clauses in their JV agreements in a way that is compliant with the Turkish Private International Law Act and intellectual property law.