Social Media Reputation Damage and Moral Damages Lawsuits

Entrance

Social media is one of the most powerful digital platforms today, directly impacting the reputation of individuals and companies. A post, comment, story, video, live broadcast, or message on platforms like Instagram, X, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Telegram, and others can reach thousands of people in a short time. Therefore, unfair, derogatory, untrue, or humiliating posts on social media don't remain just a casual conversation; they can directly affect a person's social circle, professional reputation, business relationships, family life, and psychological well-being.

Social media defamation is the unlawful posting of content that damages a person's or company's reputation, credibility, honor, dignity, professional standing, or commercial standing in the eyes of the public. This action may sometimes constitute the crime of insult, sometimes be the subject of a lawsuit for moral damages due to an attack on personal rights, sometimes violate the privacy of private life or the protection of personal data, and sometimes manifest as unfair competition or trademark infringement.

One of the fundamental pillars of protecting personal rights in Turkish law is the Turkish Civil Code. According to Article 24 of the Turkish Civil Code, a person whose personal rights have been unlawfully violated may request protection from a judge; an attack on personal rights is considered unlawful unless there is consent from the injured party, a superior private/public interest, or the exercise of authority granted by law. Article 25 of the Turkish Civil Code regulates the prevention of attacks, the termination of ongoing attacks, the determination of the unlawfulness of attacks with continuing effects, correction or publication of the decision, and claims for material and moral damages.

What is reputational damage on social media?

Social media defamation is defined as sharing content that undermines public trust, diminishes reputation, humiliates, or damages the professional/business relationships of an individual, institution, company, professional, or brand. This content can be written, visual, video, audio recording, or screenshots of private messages.

For example, when statements like "fraudster" about a lawyer, "imposter" about a doctor, "thief" about a shopkeeper, "deceiving customers" about a company, "immoral" about an employee, or "abuser" about a teacher are shared on social media, depending on the specific circumstances, both defamation and a violation of personal rights may arise. Similarly, the dissemination of information about a person's private life, the disclosure of family matters, the sharing of health information, the derogatory use of their photographs, or humiliating them through a fake account can also constitute damage to their reputation.

For defamation to occur, a post doesn't necessarily have to contain explicit profanity. False accusations, manipulated images, incomplete and misleading information, private correspondence taken out of context, targeted comments, or veiled posts that diminish a person's standing in society can also violate personal rights. Therefore, when conducting a legal assessment, not just a single word but the entire post, its context, its purpose, its target audience, and its impact on the victim are considered.

The Balance Between Freedom of Expression and the Right to Personality

In defamation cases on social media, the most important issue is striking a balance between freedom of expression and the protection of personal rights. Not every negative comment, harsh criticism, or offensive post automatically warrants compensation. The legal system protects the right to criticize, the right to report news, and freedom of expression. However, these rights do not grant the right to insult others, disclose their private lives, disseminate their personal data, or make false accusations.

The Constitutional Court, in an application concerning a ruling awarding moral damages for a social media post, assessed whether the post was made within the context of a public debate, the context of the expression used, and whether a fair balance was struck between freedom of expression and the right to reputation. In the Ozan Güven case, the Constitutional Court ruled that awarding compensation for a social media post violated freedom of expression; this decision demonstrates that courts, in social media compensation cases, must carefully examine the context of the post and its public debate aspect.

However, freedom of expression is not unlimited. It is one thing for a post to serve the public interest, fall within the scope of the right to criticize, or contribute to a current debate; quite another to directly insult, humiliate, or discredit a person in the public eye. The protection of personal rights should be considered with greater sensitivity, especially for private individuals, children, family members, patients, employees, and small businesses whose reputation is targeted.

What are the legal consequences of damaging someone's reputation on social media?

A social media post that damages someone's reputation can have multiple legal consequences. Firstly, the post may constitute the crime of defamation under Article 125 of the Turkish Penal Code. According to Article 125 of the TCK, a person who attributes a concrete act or fact to another person that is likely to harm their honor, reputation, and dignity, or who attacks them by using abusive language, shall be punished. If the defamation is committed publicly, the penalty may be increased.

Secondly, the sharing of the content may be the subject of a claim for moral damages under private law. According to Article 58 of the Turkish Code of Obligations, a person who has suffered damage from the violation of their personal rights may request a sum of money as moral damages; the judge may also decide on other forms of redress instead of or in addition to this compensation.

Thirdly, sharing personal data may also raise provisions regarding the unlawful dissemination of personal data, violation of privacy, threats, blackmail, defamation, or unfair competition. For example, targeting someone's phone number, publishing their address, or using their private photograph without permission can constitute not only damage to reputation but also a violation of personal data and privacy.

Fourthly, if the unlawful content is still online, avenues such as content removal, access blocking, or platform complaints may be considered. However, since Article 9 of Law No. 5651 regarding access blocking based on personal rights has been annulled by the Constitutional Court, the current application procedure should be evaluated separately according to the specific nature of the content. On the other hand, regarding the privacy of private life, the direct application to the Institution and the rapid access blocking mechanism under Article 9/A of Law No. 5651 remain important.

Legal Basis of a Claim for Non-Pecuniary Damages

The fundamental basis for a lawsuit for moral damages filed due to defamation on social media is Articles 24-25 of the Turkish Civil Code (TMK) and Article 58 of the Turkish Code of Obligations (TBK). Article 24 of the TMK provides protection against unlawful attacks on personal rights. Article 25 regulates the prevention and cessation of the attack, the determination of its illegality, correction, and claims for compensation. Furthermore, the plaintiff may file a lawsuit for the protection of personal rights in the court of their place of residence or the court of the defendant's place of residence.

Article 58 of the Turkish Code of Obligations stipulates that a person whose personal rights have been violated may claim compensation for non-pecuniary damages. The purpose of non-pecuniary damages is to partially alleviate the suffering, grief, hurt, loss of reputation, and emotional distress experienced by the victim. Non-pecuniary damages are not a means of unjust enrichment; however, they should not be so low as to be symbolic and ineffective. Especially considering the speed of dissemination, reach, and impact on the victim of social media posts, compensation should serve a deterrent and balancing function.

In a claim for moral damages, the court considers several factors together: the content of the post, the severity of the language used, who the post reached, the fault of the person who made the post, the victim's standing in society, how long the post remained online, whether the perpetrator apologized or made a correction, whether the post was repeated, and the intensity of the moral damage suffered by the victim.

Which social media posts can be subject to compensation claims?

The types of social media posts that can be subject to compensation claims are very diverse. Examples include severely insulting someone in an Instagram comment, making false accusations against someone via X, mocking someone in a TikTok video, targeting someone in a Facebook group, sharing screenshots of WhatsApp conversations, disseminating personal information in a Telegram channel, or making defamatory claims in a YouTube video.

It is not necessary for the victim's name to be explicitly written in a post. If the person is tagged, their photo is used, their username is provided, or their identity can be understood through their profession or the event they are involved in, the victim can be considered identifiable. For example, phrases like "the lawyer in this case," "the doctor at this hospital," "the manager of this apartment building," or "the principal of this school" can clearly identify the victim within a specific social circle.

Companies and businesses can also suffer reputational damage due to social media posts. False allegations of fraud, unfounded claims of selling counterfeit products, organized comments alleging customer deception, or smear campaigns by competitors can all damage a company's commercial reputation. While claims for moral damages for legal entities are evaluated based on the specific circumstances of the case, protecting commercial reputation is a vital interest recognized by the legal system.

The Relationship Between the Crime of Defamation and Claims for Non-Pecuniary Damages

If a social media post that damages reputation also constitutes defamation, the victim can file both a criminal complaint and a lawsuit for moral damages. These two processes are different. In a criminal investigation, the perpetrator's guilt and criminal responsibility are examined. In a lawsuit for moral damages, the violation of personal rights, the damage, fault, appropriate causal link, and moral compensation are evaluated.

The initiation of a criminal case or a conviction can constitute strong evidence in favor of the victim in a claim for moral damages. However, it is not always necessary to wait for the finalization of a criminal case before filing a civil lawsuit for moral damages. In some cases, a civil lawsuit can be filed even while the criminal investigation is ongoing. Strategically, one can await the evidence in the criminal case file, expert examination, IP identification, or a conviction.

The time limit for filing a complaint is also important in cases of defamation. Since many forms of defamation are subject to complaint, the victim must exercise their right to complain within the prescribed time limit from the date they learn of the act and the perpetrator. However, the statute of limitations and the time limit for filing a claim for moral damages are evaluated differently. Therefore, the victim should not confuse a criminal complaint with a claim for damages, but should consider both options separately.

Gathering Evidence in a Social Media Reputation Damage Case

In social media defamation cases, the most critical stage is gathering evidence. This is because posts can be deleted, stories can disappear within 24 hours, accounts can be closed, usernames can be changed, or content can be transferred to different accounts. Therefore, the victim must protect the evidence before initiating legal proceedings.

A screenshot can be taken as evidence; however, a screenshot alone may not always be sufficient. The full URL of the post, username, profile link, date and time information, content of the post, comments, likes, whether the post is public, follower count, reach of the post, story screenshots, video recordings, and any screen recordings should be saved.

Taking screen recordings is useful for Instagram stories, TikTok videos, X posts, or Facebook shares. In WhatsApp and Telegram chats, the entire conversation, including group name, number of participants, message date, and sender information, should be preserved. In private messages, instead of just cutting out the offensive lines, it's better to record the conversation in context.

If necessary, notarization, evidence gathering, expert reports, or forensic digital analysis may also be considered. Strong evidence is essential, especially when dealing with high-follower accounts, damage to commercial reputation, fake accounts, organized smear campaigns, disclosure of private life, or claims for high compensation.

How is the amount of moral damages determined?

The amount of compensation for non-pecuniary damages due to reputational damage on social media varies from case to case. There is no fixed rate for non-pecuniary damages under Turkish law. The judge determines an appropriate amount based on the specific circumstances of the case. The aim here is to compensate the victim for their emotional distress and to strike a fair balance against the unlawful attack.

The content of the shared content is crucial in determining the amount of compensation. Serious insults, false accusations, sexually explicit content, disclosure of private life, sharing of health data, targeting family members, or directly damaging professional reputation can all increase the amount of compensation. The reach of the shared content is also important. A post on an account with hundreds of thousands of followers may not have the same impact as a private message between two individuals.

Factors considered include how long the post remained online, whether it was deleted, whether the perpetrator apologized, whether it was a one-off or systematic act, the victim's professional standing, and whether the post caused any real social or commercial harm. For example, false accusations against a doctor, lawyer, teacher, company executive, influencer, or tradesperson can directly affect their professional relationship based on trust.

Furthermore, the court may also decide on other forms of redress besides compensation. Article 58 of the Turkish Code of Obligations stipulates that the judge may determine other forms of redress instead of or in addition to compensation, in particular by issuing a decision condemning the attack and ordering the publication of this decision.

Does deleting a post eliminate liability for damages?

The subsequent deletion of an unlawful post does not automatically erase the prior violation of personal rights. At the time of posting, the victim's reputation may have been damaged, the post may have been seen by third parties, or the victim may have suffered emotional distress. Therefore, deleting the post does not completely eliminate liability; however, it may be taken into account in determining the amount of compensation and assessing fault.

The perpetrator deleting the post, apologizing, publishing a correction, or admitting to providing false information may lessen the harm to the victim. However, deleting the post may not completely resolve the damage, especially if screenshots of the post have been circulated, reposted by different accounts, or reached a wide audience.

Therefore, it is crucial for the victim to obtain evidence before the post is deleted. If the link becomes inaccessible after the perpetrator removes the content, it can create difficulties in proving the case. The victim should take screenshots and screen recordings as soon as they see the post, save the URL if possible, and seek notarized documentation if necessary.

Content Removal, Access Restriction, and Correction Requests

If defamatory content remains online on social media, the victim's primary goal may be to have it removed. Platforms can utilize their own complaint mechanisms. On platforms like Instagram, X, TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube, complaints can be filed under headings such as defamation, harassment, personal data breach, impersonation, sharing of private images, and privacy violations.

In addition, Article 9/A of Law No. 5651 is important regarding publications that violate the right to privacy. According to this regulation, a person claiming that their right to privacy has been violated can directly apply to the Authority and request a measure to block access to the content. The application must include the full URL of the publication causing the violation, the aspects in which the violation occurred, and information to prove identity; access providers are required to implement the measure within a maximum of four hours.

In cases involving requests for content removal and access blocking based on personal rights, the current application strategy must be carefully determined, given that Article 9 of Law No. 5651 has been annulled by the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court's decisions emphasize that access blocking and content removal measures are closely related to freedom of expression and freedom of the press, and that proportionality and effective remedies are crucial in this area.

Damage to Company Reputation on Social Media

Social media reputational damage isn't limited to individuals. Companies, brands, clinics, restaurants, hotels, law firms, e-commerce sites, and service providers can also suffer significant reputational losses due to their social media posts. In particular, Google reviews, Instagram posts, X campaigns, TikTok videos, and complaint platforms can directly impact a business's reputation.

Consumers are legally protected to share their genuine experiences. A customer can write that they were dissatisfied with the service they received, that the product arrived late, or that the business acted indifferently. However, this right has limits. False claims, defamatory statements, fake reviews organized by competitors, unfounded fraud accusations, or smear campaigns aimed at discrediting a brand may give rise to legal liability.

For companies, financial losses may also arise. If a social media post results in customer loss, contract cancellation, decreased orders, loss of business partnerships, or a decline in brand value, monetary compensation can be claimed. However, the financial loss must be concretely proven. Damages to reputation/commercial standing are assessed based on the nature, reach, and impact of the post.

Defense from the Defendant's Perspective

For individuals facing a lawsuit for moral damages due to a social media post, the defense must be carefully constructed. Not every social media post constitutes grounds for compensation. A legal defense can be made if the post is based on a real event, serves the public interest, constitutes measured criticism, is made within the scope of consumer experience, or falls within the right to inform.

However, simply stating "I only criticized" in the defense is insufficient. The accuracy of the shared content, the appropriateness of the language used, whether it targeted an individual, whether it invaded their privacy, whether it disseminated personal data, and the purpose of the sharing must be explained with concrete evidence. The right to criticize can be harsh and shocking; however, if the criticism contains expressions that are humiliating, degrading, or discrediting to the individual in the public eye, liability may arise.

Furthermore, defenses such as the account being hacked, the post not being theirs, the screenshot being manipulated, or the post being taken out of context must also be supported by concrete evidence. The reliability of digital evidence in social media cases is also a matter of debate.

Conclusion

Social media defamation and claims for moral damages are among the most important areas of dispute in contemporary IT law. Posts on platforms like Instagram, X, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp, and Telegram can quickly and seriously impact the reputation of individuals and companies. A comment, story, video, live broadcast, private message, or the sharing of a fake account can give rise to liability for defamation, violation of personal rights, violation of privacy, breach of personal data, libel, unfair competition, and claims for moral damages.

Articles 24 and 25 of the Turkish Civil Code provide for protection against attacks on personal rights, including prevention and cessation of the attack, determination of illegality, correction, publication of the decision, and compensation for material and moral damages. Article 58 of the Turkish Code of Obligations stipulates that a person whose personal rights have been violated may claim compensation for moral damages.

However, freedom of expression should not be overlooked in social media compensation cases. The Constitutional Court's rulings on violations in cases where compensation was awarded due to social media posts demonstrate that courts must carefully consider the context of the post, its contribution to public debate, the nature of the expression used, and the balance between the right to privacy and freedom of expression.

The most important step for the victim is to gather evidence quickly and legally. Screenshots, screen recordings, URLs, usernames, date and time information, the reach of the post, comments, likes, and witnesses, if any, must be preserved. If the content is still online, a complaint against the platform, an application under Article 9/A of Law No. 5651 (if there is a violation of privacy), a criminal complaint, and a claim for moral damages should be considered together.

In conclusion, although social media may seem like a "virtual" space, its legal consequences are very real. A post that damages reputation can affect a person's professional life, business relationships, social circle, and mental peace. Therefore, social media posts should be measured, truthful, lawful, and respectful of personal rights; and those who are wrongfully attacked should manage the process with professional legal support without losing evidence.