Occupancy and Building Use Permits in Urban Transformation

 What are occupancy permits and building use permits in urban transformation, why are they important, is the contractor obligated to obtain an occupancy permit, is handover valid without an occupancy permit, and what are the rights of the property owners?

---

What is Settlement in Urban Transformation?

In urban transformation projects, the occupancy permit, or building use permit, is an official document certifying that the new building constructed after the demolition of an old building within the scope of risky structures or urban transformation projects has been completed in accordance with its permit, approved projects, technical regulations, and engineering principles. This document, commonly known as an "occupancy certificate," is referred to as a "building use permit" in legal terminology.

According to Article 30 of the Zoning Law No. 3194, when a building is completely finished, or when only partially usable parts are completed, an occupancy permit must be obtained from the issuing authority for the entire building to be used. The same provision stipulates that, upon the owner's application, it must be determined that the building conforms to the permit and its annexes and that there are no technical obstacles to its use.

Therefore, an occupancy permit is not just a simple document obtained from the municipality. It is the most important document demonstrating that the new building is legally usable, that the structure has been completed in accordance with the permit and project, and that the independent units and common areas have passed official inspection. In urban transformation projects, the real guarantee for the property owner is not just receiving the keys to the apartment; it is the delivery of the independent unit with an occupancy permit, in accordance with the project, and in a legally usable condition.

Why is housing so important in urban transformation?

The primary goal of urban transformation is to demolish risky or economically obsolete buildings and replace them with safe, healthy, and legally compliant structures. Demolishing an old building alone does not guarantee the success of urban transformation. The real aim is for property owners to acquire new and safe independent units. In most cases, this legal completion depends on obtaining an occupancy permit.

Even if an owner has physically moved into their apartment in a building without an occupancy permit, the structure may be considered legally and technically incomplete. This is because, without an occupancy permit, the building's compliance with the permit and its annexes may not have been fully determined by the authorities. This situation can create problems with electricity, water, and natural gas subscriptions, the establishment of condominium ownership, the sale of independent units, bank loan applications, insurance transactions, valuation, and future lawsuits regarding defective workmanship.

Therefore, in urban transformation contracts, the delivery clause should not be limited to "turnkey delivery." The contractor's obligation to deliver should be fulfilled when the building is completed in accordance with the permit, approved project, technical specifications, zoning regulations, and contract; when common areas are finished; when independent units are made usable; and when the occupancy permit is obtained.

The Planned Areas Zoning Regulation also defines the occupancy permit as a document indicating that the building has been completed in accordance with the project plans attached to the building permit and that its use is permitted. Within the scope of the regulation, whether the building has been completed in accordance with the building permit and its attachments is of importance to the technical supervisors and the relevant administration when issuing an occupancy permit.

Are "Settlement" and "Handover of the Key" the Same Thing?

One of the most common disputes in urban transformation projects is the contractor's claim of "I handed over the keys, I completed the handover," while property owners object, saying "the occupancy permit hasn't been obtained, common areas are incomplete, the handover is not finished." The fundamental distinction here is this: handing over the keys is a physical delivery; the occupancy permit, on the other hand, is a legal and administrative document indicating that the building is officially usable.

The contractor can hand over the keys of the independent unit to the owner. The owner can move into the apartment. However, if the building has not yet received its occupancy permit, the handover cannot always be considered legally complete and without defects. This is because in a building without an occupancy permit, common areas may be incomplete, there may be discrepancies with the building permit project, and the fire extinguishing system, elevator, parking lot, shelter, energy efficiency, mechanical installations, or building inspection process may not be completed.

Therefore, including the following provision in the urban transformation contract is in the owner's best interest: "The delivery of independent units is not considered complete merely with the handover of the keys; obtaining the occupancy permit, completion of common areas, compliance with technical specifications, and delivery of independent units in a physically usable condition are also required."

If the contract stipulates delivery only on a turnkey basis, the property owners' position may be weakened. However, even so, if the building is delivered with serious deficiencies, if common areas are incomplete, if there are violations of the permit, or if the inability to obtain an occupancy permit is due to the contractor's fault, the property owners may have claims for defective/incomplete workmanship, delay compensation, rent assistance, penalties, and breach of contract.

Is the contractor obligated to obtain an occupancy permit?

If explicitly stipulated in the urban transformation contract, the contractor is obligated to obtain the occupancy permit. Even without an explicit provision in the contract, the contractor is required to complete the new building in accordance with the permit, project, technical specifications, and relevant legislation, given the nature of the work undertaken. If an occupancy permit cannot be obtained, the reason is often that the building was constructed in violation of the permit or its annexes, due to incomplete workmanship, lack of technical compliance, or failure to complete administrative documentation.

In urban transformation contracts, it should not be considered sufficient for the contractor to merely physically construct the building. The contractor should also be obligated to obtain the building permit, prepare the projects, conduct the building inspection processes, follow up on procedures with the municipality and relevant authorities, ensure technical compliance, complete common areas, obtain the necessary reports and documents, and secure the occupancy permit.

Therefore, the following points must be clearly defined in the contract: who will obtain the occupancy permit, who will cover the occupancy permit costs, within what timeframe will the occupancy permit be obtained, will the handover be considered valid without an occupancy permit, will the contractor have to pay a penalty for delay and rental assistance if the occupancy permit is not obtained, and will the failure to obtain an occupancy permit be grounds for termination or forfeiture of the security deposit?

In urban transformation projects, the building occupancy permit is a critical threshold in terms of the guarantee provided by the contractor to the administration. The Implementing Regulation of Law No. 6306 stipulates that the guarantee will be returned to the relevant party after the project or construction work is completed in accordance with the contract and specifications and the building occupancy permit is obtained; if the work is not completed in accordance with the contract and specifications, the guarantee may be converted into cash and transferred to the person or institution that will complete the project.

This regulation demonstrates that housing is of central importance not only in the landlord-contractor relationship but also in the guarantee system under Law No. 6306.

Is it possible to establish a condominium ownership structure without obtaining an occupancy permit?

In urban transformation projects, easement rights are often established first, and the transition to condominium ownership takes place after the building is completed and the occupancy permit is obtained. Easement rights allow for the determination of independent units based on the project plans even before the building is completed. Condominium ownership, on the other hand, is the finalized ownership of independent units within the completed building.

Problems may arise in transitioning to condominium ownership without obtaining an occupancy permit. This is because, in most cases, a fundamental requirement for establishing condominium ownership is that the building be completed and issued an occupancy permit. In practice, in some projects, even though a floor easement has been established, the transition to condominium ownership cannot be made because an occupancy permit has not been obtained; this situation creates problems in the sale of independent units, their use for loans, and title deed transactions.

Therefore, the urban transformation contract should clearly state that the contractor is obligated not only to establish the floor easement but also to complete the transition to condominium ownership after obtaining the building occupancy permit. Otherwise, even if the owner has actually moved into their apartment, they may find themselves with an independent unit for which condominium ownership has not been established in the land registry.

What problems can result from not obtaining an occupancy permit?

Failure to obtain an occupancy permit is one of the most important indicators that the urban transformation project is incomplete. This can lead to many legal and practical problems.

Firstly, the building may not be legally considered fully operational. Article 30 of the Zoning Law No. 3194 stipulates that a building occupancy permit is required for a structure to be used. Therefore, a building without an occupancy permit may remain in an incomplete legal status.

Secondly, subscription problems may arise. Temporary subscriptions, construction site subscriptions, or incomplete subscription practices for infrastructure services such as electricity, water, natural gas, and sewage can make long-term use difficult for property owners.

Thirdly, the transition to condominium ownership may be delayed. Failure to transition to condominium ownership can negatively affect the property value, access to credit, marketability, and the legal security of the independent unit.

Fourthly, the market value of the property may decrease. There may be a difference in economic value between a property with an occupancy permit and one without. Banks consider the occupancy permit status when granting loans, buyers when making purchases, and appraisal reports when evaluating properties.

Fifthly, suspicion of defective or incomplete workmanship arises. The reason for not obtaining an occupancy permit is often due to discrepancies with the permit and project, technical deficiencies, common area problems, fire safety deficiencies, or elevator or plumbing problems. In this case, the owners may raise claims against the contractor for insufficient work costs, defective workmanship, delay compensation, and breach of contract.

How is the reason for not obtaining an occupancy permit determined?

Failure to obtain an occupancy permit is not always due to the contractor's fault. Therefore, the reason why the building occupancy permit could not be obtained must first be determined. Without correctly identifying the cause, a legal or warning process cannot be properly established.

The reasons for not obtaining an occupancy permit may include: construction deviating from the permit project, illegal addition of floors or areas, incomplete common areas, lack of a fire safety system, failure to obtain an elevator compliance certificate, failure to fulfill parking obligations, deficiencies in the building inspection process, outstanding fees and tax debts, problems with the Social Security Institution (SGK) clearance certificate, missing energy performance certificates or technical reports, failure to make project modifications, irregularities identified by the municipality, or incomplete documentation from the property owners.

Therefore, the first thing property owners should do is to apply in writing to the relevant municipality or the issuing authority to inquire about the status of their occupancy permit application and what deficiencies exist. The municipality's letter is one of the strongest pieces of evidence showing why the occupancy permit could not be obtained. If the deficiencies stem from the contractor's workmanship, the contractor may be held responsible. If the deficiencies are due to the property owners, a different assessment will be made.

Within the scope of the Planned Areas Zoning Regulation, the conformity of the building to the permit and its attached projects, the responsibilities of the technical supervisors, and the supervision of the relevant administration are important in the building occupancy permit process. Ministry materials regarding building permit and building occupancy permit processes also show that this process is carried out on the axis of project, permit, technical responsibility, and administrative compliance.

What can the landlord do if the handover is made before the occupancy permit is obtained?

If the contractor wants to deliver the individual units without obtaining the occupancy permit, the owner should be cautious. A statement in the delivery report indicating "received complete and without defects" may make it difficult to seek legal redress later. Therefore, the owner should have the delivery report documented that the occupancy permit has not been obtained, mentions any deficiencies in the common areas, any defects in the individual units, and states that the delivery was accepted with reservations.

Can the owner completely refuse delivery before the occupancy permit is obtained? The answer to this question depends on the contract, the nature of the deficiencies, and whether the building is actually usable. If the contract explicitly stipulates delivery upon receipt of the occupancy permit, the owner can argue that the delivery is incomplete. Even if there is no such provision in the contract, the owner can still argue that the delivery is incomplete if the building is contrary to the permit, incomplete, or seriously defective.

The owner may exercise the following rights: send a notarized notice to the contractor, demand the issuance of the occupancy permit, request the rectification of incomplete works, demand the continuation of rent assistance and late payment penalties, declare that the delivery is not complete until the building use permit is obtained, have evidence examined, file a lawsuit for defective and incomplete workmanship, demand compensation for delays, and, if the conditions are met, pursue termination of the contract or conversion of the security deposit into cash.

Does Failure to Obtain an Occupancy Permit Result in Liability for Delay?

If the contract stipulates that delivery is conditional upon obtaining the occupancy permit, and the delivery period expires before the permit is obtained, and the contractor has failed to obtain it due to negligence, the owner may demand compensation for delay or a penalty clause. In this case, the contractor's defense of "I have actually delivered the apartments" may not be sufficient on its own. Because if the delivery obligation in the contract is defined as delivery with an occupancy permit, delivery is not considered complete until the occupancy permit is obtained.

Even in cases where the contract does not stipulate that delivery is conditional on occupancy, failure to obtain an occupancy permit may be considered a delay or incomplete performance depending on the specific circumstances. For example, if the building is physically unusable, utility subscriptions cannot be obtained, common areas are incomplete, or the municipality does not issue an occupancy permit due to irregularities in the building permit, the owner may argue that the delivery has not been completed.

If compensation for delay is to be claimed, the following documents must be collected: urban transformation contract, delivery time clause, building permit, occupancy permit application documents, deficiency letter from the municipality, delivery records, notarized notices, rent payments, delay penalty clause, technical specifications, and expert assessment report.

The Relationship Between Housing and Defective/Incomplete Workmanship

The inability to obtain an occupancy permit is often linked to defective or incomplete construction work. If the contractor has deviated from the project specifications, failed to complete common areas, not made the fire or elevator systems compliant, not fulfilled parking obligations, or performed work contrary to the technical specifications, an occupancy permit may not be issued.

In this situation, it is not enough for the property owners to simply say "obtain the occupancy permit." First, the deficiencies preventing the occupancy permit must be identified, the cost of remedying these deficiencies must be calculated, and a written warning must be given to the contractor. If the contractor does not remedy the deficiencies, the property owner can have evidence gathered and file a lawsuit for defective and incomplete workmanship.

Deficiencies in common areas are particularly important from an occupancy permit perspective. Inadequate elevators, missing fire escapes or fire extinguishing systems, incomplete parking areas, deviations from the project plans in shelters or technical spaces, and deficiencies in the roof and exterior walls can all prevent the issuance of an occupancy permit. Therefore, not only the interior of the apartment but also all common areas of the building should be inspected during the handover process.

Will the security deposit be refunded if the occupancy permit is not obtained?

Within the scope of the Implementing Regulation of Law No. 6306, the building occupancy permit is linked to an important threshold in terms of the guarantee system. The regulation stipulates that the guarantee will be returned to the relevant party after the project or construction work is completed in accordance with the contract and specifications and the building occupancy permit is obtained.

This provision provides an important safeguard for the property owner. Because the security deposit should not be returned until the contractor completes the work, obtains the occupancy permit, or delivers the property in accordance with the contract and specifications. If the return of the security deposit is considered before the building occupancy permit is obtained, the property owners should object to the authorities and report any breaches of contract.

If the contract also stipulates special guarantees, the return of these guarantees must also be tied to the occupancy permit. For example, bank guarantee letters, performance guarantees, or mortgages on the contractor's share should not be removed until the building occupancy permit is obtained and any incomplete work is completed.

Sale of Contractor Shares and Occupancy Permit

In urban transformation projects, contractors typically secure financing by selling their allocated independent units. However, the contractor's premature sale of their shares weakens the security of the property owners. If the contractor freely sells all their shares before obtaining the occupancy permit, they may have already secured their economic gain before completing the project.

Therefore, in urban transformation contracts, the sale of contractor shares should be tied to the construction progress level and the occupancy permit stage. The sale of all independent units allocated to the contractor should, if possible, be restricted until the building occupancy permit is obtained. This would provide the contractor with a strong economic motivation to obtain the occupancy permit and complete the project.

The Implementing Regulation of Law No. 6306 also contains provisions stating that the sale of independent units allocated to the contractor can be carried out according to the construction progress level and subject to the permission of the administration; and that the sale of the entire contractor's share can be permitted upon submission of a building occupancy permit or receipt of a document confirming the completion of the construction.

Therefore, property owners should not allow the uncontrolled sale of contractor shares before occupancy permits are obtained.

Provisions to be Included in the Contract for Settlement

The provisions regarding occupancy permits in urban transformation contracts must be clear, detailed, and enforceable. The following provisions provide strong protection in favor of the property owner:

The contractor is responsible for obtaining the building occupancy permit.

The handover is not considered complete until the building occupancy permit is obtained.

Turnkey delivery does not substitute for delivery with occupancy permit.

Rent assistance will continue until the occupancy permit is obtained.

If the delivery deadline is exceeded, a late payment penalty will be applied in addition to the rental assistance.

The contractor's deposit will not be refunded until the building occupancy permit is obtained.

None of the independent units allocated to the contractor can be transferred or sold before the occupancy permit is obtained.

If the failure to obtain the occupancy permit is due to the contractor's fault, the property owners reserve the right to compensation and termination of the contract.

Any defective or incomplete workmanship that prevents occupancy will be rectified free of charge by the contractor.

Occupancy permit fees, project modification costs, municipal procedures, and technical compliance expenses are covered by the contractor.

If these provisions are not explicitly included in the contract, serious disputes may arise between the parties if the occupancy permit is not obtained.

What lawsuits can be filed if an occupancy permit is not obtained?

The types of lawsuits that can be filed in case of failure to obtain an occupancy permit vary depending on the specific circumstances. If the contractor is obligated to obtain the occupancy permit according to the contract but has failed to do so, the property owner can file a lawsuit for breach of contract.

The main types of lawsuits that can be filed include: lawsuits for specific performance to obtain an occupancy permit, lawsuits for compensation for incomplete and defective workmanship, lawsuits for delay compensation, lawsuits for penalty clause claims, lawsuits for rental assistance claims, lawsuits for compensation for depreciation in value, termination of the contract due to contractor default, lawsuits for cancellation and registration of title deeds, requests for the conversion of security deposits into cash, and applications for evidence gathering.

The most important evidence in these cases includes contracts, technical specifications, building permits, municipal deficiency notices, occupancy permit application documents, building inspection certificates, handover reports, photographs and video recordings, notarized notices, rent payment documents, expert reports, and, if available, apartment/site management records.

The Importance of Obtaining a Written Response from the Municipality

If an occupancy permit is not issued, one of the strongest pieces of evidence for property owners is a written response from the municipality. The property owner can apply to the relevant municipality and request answers to the following questions: has an application for an occupancy permit been submitted, what stage is the application at, what are the missing documents, are there any discrepancies between the building permit and the project, what technical or administrative deficiencies are preventing the issuance of the occupancy permit, and who appears to be responsible for these deficiencies?

This document can reveal the contractor's fault. For example, if the municipality responds with statements such as "the fire extinguishing system is inadequate," "no elevator compliance certificate has been submitted," "construction was carried out contrary to the permit project," or "parking obligations have not been fulfilled," the property owner can file a lawsuit against the contractor based on this document.

Acting solely on verbal information without receiving a written response from the municipality is risky. Written documentation is required for legal proceedings and warning notices.

Conclusion

In urban transformation projects, the occupancy permit and building use permit are the most important documents demonstrating not only the physical completion of the new building but also its legal and technical usability. For the owner, true handover is often not just about receiving the keys; it only becomes meaningful when the independent unit is completed in accordance with the permit, project, technical specifications, and regulations, and the building use permit is obtained.

In an urban transformation project that lacks an occupancy permit, property owners may face numerous problems related to utility subscriptions, condominium ownership, sales, loans, valuation, common area usage, defective workmanship, and late payment penalties. Therefore, the urban transformation contract should clearly stipulate the contractor's obligation to obtain an occupancy permit, state that delivery is not considered complete without the building occupancy permit, extend rental assistance and late payment penalties until the occupancy permit is obtained, and make the return of guarantees conditional on the occupancy permit.

The fact that the return of the security deposit is tied to obtaining the building occupancy permit in the Implementing Regulation of Law No. 6306 clearly demonstrates how important occupancy permits are as a guarantee in urban transformation.

In conclusion, in urban transformation, the occupancy permit is not just an ordinary municipal document obtained at the end of the process. The occupancy permit is a fundamental document demonstrating that the contractor has completed their work, that the building is legally usable, and that the owners have safely and legally acquired their new independent units. Therefore, owners should prioritize the occupancy permit requirement from the contract stage to the handover stage, enforce this obligation on the contractor, and not accept complete handover without obtaining the occupancy permit.