Climate Migrants and the New Definition of Refugee: The Legal Crisis of the 21st Century

Global warming, drought, rising sea levels, and natural disasters are no longer just environmental problems, but problems for humanity .
Millions of people around the world forced to migrate .
Are these people “refugees” or “climate migrants”?
This is one of the most complex questions in modern international law.

"Do people displaced by climate change have the right to international protection?"

---

🔹 1. What is a Climate Migrant?

A climate migrant is defined as a person who is forced to migrate because they can no longer sustain their livelihood in their environment due to climate change-related disasters (floods, droughts, desertification, sea surges, etc.)

🌪️ Example:

• Rising sea levels in Bangladesh,
• Drought in Africa,
• The flooding of islands in the Pacific Islands.

These people leave their country not for political reasons , but because of natural conditions

---

🔹 2. The Current Legal Gap: "Refugee" or Not?

The 1951 Geneva Refugee Conventiondefines a refugee as follows:

"A person who is persecuted because of their race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion."

👉 Climate or environmental reasons are not involved here . Therefore, climate migrants do not have "refugee" status.

Therefore, "vulnerable migrants" .

---

🔹 3. The Reality of the 21st Century: Forced but Undefined Migration

According to the UN, more than 250 million people will be displaced due to climate change by 2050. However, no international protection mechanism is fully in place for these people

🌊 The people of Kiribati and Tuvalu in the Pacific Islands face the risk of their countries being submerged under the sea.
When these people seek refuge in another country, "illegal immigrants" rather than "refugees" .

---

🔹 4. Initiatives in International Law

📘 A. UN Human Rights Council Resolutions (2018 – 2023)

• Climate change is recognized as a violation of the "rights to life, shelter, and health.".
• However, the term "climate migrant" has still binding status .

📘 B. UNHCR (UN High Commissioner for Refugees)

• 2019 document, “Legal Considerations for Climate-Related Displacement,”
  climate-related migration should be included within the scope of refugee status .

📘 C. Paris Climate Agreement (2015)

• 8. The article provides for "support for people displaced due to climate change,"
     but citizenship or refugee status .

---

🔹 5. ECHR and “Climate Refugee” Decisions

📜 Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand (UN Human Rights Committee, 2020)

• Teitiota, from the island of Kiribati, requested refugee status, stating that his country would be submerged under water.
• The committee rejected the application but used this historic statement:
  

  “If climate change poses a serious threat to human life in the future, non-refoulement (refoulement) may be applied.”

This decision the first glimmer of hope for climate migrants under international law .

---

🔹 6. State Sovereignty and the New Legal Crisis

Citizenship and refugee status are under the sovereign authority of the state . Whether a person is granted citizenship or asylum is at the discretion of the state. However, climate migration challenges this understanding of sovereignty because it arises as a result of a global cause

🌐 So, for the first time, people are becoming stateless for a reason for which no state is directly responsible.
This is a 21st-century legal crisis that shakes the classic understanding of citizenship.

---

🔹 7. Türkiye Perspective

Due to its geographical location, Turkey a transit point for climate-related migration .
Although the term "climate migrant" is not yet included in Turkish law:

• the Law on Foreigners and International Protection (6458) , limited protection is possible with a “humanitarian residence permit”.
• Persons displaced due to disaster risk are protected at the administrative discretion of AFAD and the General Directorate of Migration Management.

However, climate migrants do not have a special status.

---

🔹 8. Is a New Legal Definition Necessary?

Yes.
Because the current definition of "refugee" was written in 1951, long before the climate crisis.
Today, persecution is not only caused by human hands, but by changes in nature .

👉 Therefore, legal experts are proposing a new concept:

"Climate Refugee" or "Environmental Asylum Seeker"

This status should grant international protection to people whose habitats are being destroyed due to climate change .

---

🔹 9. Legal Recommendations for the Future

✅ 1. A "Climate Migrants Convention" should be drafted at the UN level.
✅ 2. A "climate" justification should be added to the 1951 Geneva Convention.
✅ 3. A definition of "climate-related displacement" should be established to combat statelessness.
✅ 4. A joint climate migration management mechanism should be established between the EU, Turkey, and the UN.
✅ 5. The concept of environmental justice should become part of citizenship law.

---

🔹 10. Result

Climate migrants are the stateless people of the new century.
They can neither be considered refugees in the classical sense, nor can they receive protection from their own governments.

The greatest test for law is no longer wars, but protecting human dignity in the face of nature's vengeance . 🌍⚖️

21. In the 21st century, the concepts of citizenship and refugee status will have to be redefined.
    Because while borders are disappearing in the climate crisis, the law still recognizes borders.