Bringing Prohibited Substances into Sports Venues: Search, Seizure, and Lawfulness

1. Introduction

Sporting events are not only entertainment venues but also risky environments in terms of maintaining public order. Therefore , Law No. 6222 on the Prevention of Violence and Disorder in Sports explicitly prohibits the introduction of prohibited substances, weapons, explosives, or alcoholic beverages into sporting venues .

However, the enforcement of these prohibitions is achieved through direct search and seizure operations . Therefore, the central question of this article is:

"Within what limits are searches and seizures carried out by law enforcement officers in sports venues legally permissible?"

---

2. Legal Basis: Articles 14–15 of Law No. 6222

2.1. Article Text

"Anyone who brings a handgun, knife, explosive device, cutting or piercing instrument, alcoholic beverage, or any substance prohibited by the authorities into sports venues shall be punished with imprisonment from six months to two years."

The same article also states that the penalty will be increased if these acts are committed collectively by fan groups .

2.2. Protected Legal Value

The purpose of Article 14 of Law No. 6222 is not only to protect individual safety but also social peace and the peaceful nature of sport . Therefore, the crime is considered an abstract threat to public safety; the act does not necessarily have to cause harm

---

3. Search Authority and Articles 116–119 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

3.1. Rule: Judge's Decision

According to Article 116 of the Code of Criminal Procedure:

"Law enforcement cannot conduct searches without reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed."

Therefore, as a rule, every search operation a judge's order .
However, preventive searches at sporting events are generally without a judge's order ; this situation requires special consideration.

3.2. Exception: Cases Where Delay Would Be Detrimental

CMK Article 119/2:

"In cases where delay would be detrimental, searches may be conducted with a written order from the public prosecutor."

Because sports facilities are public spaces with a high risk of crime, the presumption of delayed status is generally accepted.
However, this does not authorize arbitrary searches.

---

4. Types of Searches: Forensic and Preventive Searches

Most searches conducted in sports facilities preventative in nature.
Therefore, that the search warrant is in writing and that the search is limited to the purpose for which it was conducted .

Supreme Court 19th Criminal Chamber, Case No. 2021/432, Decision No. 2022/1023:

"Body searches at stadium entrances are preventative in nature and may be conducted for public safety purposes without requiring reasonable suspicion."

---

5. Seizure Authority and Articles 123–127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

5.1. Conditions for Seizure

Seizure is a procedure aimed at items that constitute evidence of a crime or were used in the commission of a crime.
Within the scope of Article 14 of Law No. 6222, these items generally include:

• Explosive or flammable materials,

• Cutting and piercing tools,

• Prohibited chemicals or alcohol.

CMK Article 123:

"Items that could be used as evidence related to a crime may be seized."

5.2. Procedure and Minutes

The seizure report must include the following elements:

• Time, place, type of item,

• The owner or the person in possession of it,

• Identities of the law enforcement officers involved in the operation.

Seizure without a written record or signature is unlawful.

---

6. Consequences of Unlawful Search and Seizure

CMK Articles 206/2 and 217/2:

"Evidence obtained illegally cannot be used as the basis for a judgment."

Therefore:

• Judicial searches conducted without a judge/prosecutor's order,

• Non-written preventive calling,

• Seizures not recorded in official documents
  are considered by the court to lack evidentiary value.

Supreme Court 7th Criminal Chamber, Case No. 2020/734, Decision No. 2021/856:

"A knife found during a search at the stadium entrance without a court order cannot be used as evidence."

---

7. Constitutional Limits: Articles 20 and 21 of the Constitution

• Article 20: The right to protection of private life and personal data.

• Article 21: Inviolability of the home and search procedures.

Although a sports arena is a public space, searching someone's person and bag an invasion of privacy .
Therefore, every search:

• Legal basis,

• For a legitimate purpose,

• with the principle of proportionality
  .

Constitutional Court Decision No. 2020/11345, "Body Search at Stadium Entrance":

"Conducting general searches on everyone without a concrete threat constitutes a violation of the right to personal security."

---

8. Camera Footage and Chain of Evidence

It is legal to record footage or security camera footage during a search and seizure. However, these recordings must be stored in accordance with Articles 134-138 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article 5 of the Personal Data Protection Law . If the integrity of the evidence is compromised, the court shall apply the principle that "the defendant benefits from the doubt."

---

9. Limits of Law Enforcement and the Authority to Use Force

Police Duties and Powers Law, Article 16:

“Force may be used to break resistance; however, it must be necessary and proportionate.”

Supreme Court 8th Criminal Chamber, Case No. 2021/1456, Decision No. 2022/897:

"Using force against someone who does not resist at the stadium entrance is contrary to the principle of proportionality."

The criteria that determine the limits of law enforcement intervention:

• The act poses a danger,

• Obligation and gradualness.

---

10. Return and Destruction of Seized Goods

Prohibited items seized:

• Hazardous materials → disposal,

• Alcohol → confiscation,

• Personal items → return.

According to Article 131 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the request for the return of the property is made to the prosecutor's office by the perpetrator or the owner.
In cases of unlawful seizure, the right to compensation arises (Article 19/last paragraph of the Constitution and Article 141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure).

---

11. Application through Case Law of the Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court

1. Supreme Court 19th Criminal Chamber, Case No. 2020/185, Decision No. 2021/734.

   "For the suspect, who was found with a knife at the stadium entrance, the act constitutes a completed crime."

2. Supreme Court 7th Criminal Chamber, Case No. 2021/1132, Decision No. 2022/485.

   "Article 14 of Law No. 6222 applies to spectators carrying pepper spray and alcohol; no judgment can be made if the incident occurred outside the designated area."

3. Constitutional Court Case No. 2018/7264 (Disproportionate Search Warrant)

   "The right to personal security and freedom, although it can be limited in the field of sports, is violated by arbitrary searches and detentions."

---

12. Recommendations

1. Search and Seizure Protocol:
   A protocol must be prepared between the police and the club before each match.

2. Camera Recording Requirement:
   All search operations must be recorded by security cameras.

3. Information and Consent:
   Fans must be informed of the reason and basis for the call beforehand.

4. Law Enforcement Training:
   Training on the use of force in accordance with Law No. 6222 and the Constitution should be provided.

5. Compensation Information:
   Victims of unlawful searches should be informed about their right to apply under Article 141 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

---

13. Conclusion

The crime of bringing prohibited substances into sports venues is one of the primary legal mechanisms for preventing violence and disorder in sports.
However, when implementing these measures, the legal limits of search and seizure powers must not be exceeded.

The rule of law rests on a balance between public safety and fundamental rights.
The precedents set by the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court have defined this balance through the principles of "proportionality, purpose, and transparency."

In conclusion, law enforcement officers conducting searches in stadiums should act preventively but adhere to the law, and spectators should know their rights.
Security in sports can only be ensured within the boundaries of the law.