Single Blog Title

This is a single blog caption

Determining Damages in Maritime Law

 

Determining Damages in Maritime Law

Entrance

Maritime trade is one of the most important modes of transport in international trade. Cargo transported by ships can sometimes be partially or completely damaged during transit. These damages lead to legal disputes between the carrier and the cargo owner. In such cases, it is necessary to first determine the existence of the damage and then to determine the amount of the damage .

The Turkish Commercial Code (TTK) and international regulations base the carrier's liability on the principle of compensation; however, they have established various criteria for determining the scope of compensation. Therefore, the concept of damage is not limited solely to actual loss, but also takes into account the decrease in the market value of the goods, losses arising from delayed delivery, and expenses.


1. The Concept of Damage

1.1. Legal Definition

Damage is defined as the economic loss resulting from the partial or complete loss, decrease in value, or delayed delivery of cargo.

1.2. Types of Damage

  • Actual damage (damnum emergens): Loss or damage to property.
  • Loss of profit (lucrum cessans): The profit that the cargo owner is unable to obtain due to late delivery or decrease in value.
  • Cost losses: Additional expenses incurred to prevent the damage (repair, storage, increased insurance premiums).

2. The Importance of Determining the Damage

  • Liability determination: Determining the carrier's degree of fault.
  • Calculating compensation: Objectively determining the amount to be paid to the cargo owner.
  • Insurance relationship: The scope of cargo insurance depends on the assessment of the damage.
  • Dispute resolution: Accurate assessment of damages in court and arbitration proceedings is fundamental to fair decisions.

3. Determination of Damages in the Turkish Commercial Code

3.1. Turkish Commercial Code Article 1186

Compensation is determined based on the market value of the goods at the place where they are to be delivered

3.2. In Case of Loss

If the goods are completely lost, the owner of the goods will be paid the market value of the goods at the place where they were supposed to be delivered.

3.3. In Case of Damage

If the goods are partially damaged, the difference between the value of the undamaged goods and the value of the damaged goods will be compensated.

3.4. Late Delivery

Damages arising from delay cannot exceed the freight cost. However, if the cargo owner proves higher damages, these damages can also be claimed, subject to these limits.


4. Methods of Calculating Damages

4.1. Market Value Method

This is the most commonly used method. The free market value at the delivery location is taken as the basis.

4.2. Invoice Amount

Unless otherwise agreed between the parties, the calculation may be based on the invoice value of the goods.

4.3. Comparative Method

The difference between the value of undamaged items and the value of damaged items is used to determine the extent of the damage.

4.4. Insurance Value

The amount stated in the insurance contract may also be taken into account in determining the damage.


5. Determining Damages Within the Limits of Liability

5.1. The Basis of SDR

According to the Turkish Commercial Code, the carrier's liability is:

  • 2 SDR per kg
  • Limited to 666.67 SDR per carton or piece .

5.2. Value Declaration

If the shipper has stated the specific value of the goods on the bill of lading, the carrier cannot benefit from the limitation; the carrier is liable for the declared value.


6. Determination of Damages in International Regulations

6.1. The Hague-Visby Rules

Market value is used to calculate the damage, and SDR limits are applied.

6.2. Hamburg Rules

It has adopted an approach that provides more protection to the cargo owner and has also expanded the scope of damages for late delivery.

6.3. Rotterdam Rules

Modern regulations have been introduced, detailing damage assessment to include multimodal transport.


7. Determining Damages in Light of Supreme Court Decisions

In the precedents of the Supreme Court of Appeals:

  • It is emphasized that market value should be used as the basis for calculating actual damages
  • In the event of damage, it is stated that the difference between the value of the undamaged and the damaged items will be compensated.
  • damages due to late delivery that exceeds the freight cost is limited to certain amounts.
  • Court decisions have ruled that the shipper is responsible for damages arising from inadequate packaging

8. Relationship with Insurance

8.1. Cargo Insurance

The vast majority of the damage is covered by cargo insurance.

8.2. P&I Insurance

This is carrier liability insurance that covers damages within the scope of limited liability.

8.3. Disputes

Disputes frequently arise between insurers and carriers regarding the scope and amount of damages.


9. Problems Encountered in Practice

  • Differences in market value determination: Price differences may exist at different ports.
  • Measuring late delivery losses: Proving loss of profit is difficult.
  • Packaging and packing issues: It is difficult to determine which side the damage originated from.
  • International differences: Which treaty regime will apply (The Hague-Visby, Hamburg, Rotterdam).

10th Evaluation

  • Determining the extent of the damage is key to assessing the carrier's liability.
  • Although the market value method provides the fairest solution, it may not always be practical.
  • Differences between international contracts, particularly regarding damages for late delivery, create disputes between the parties.
  • The Supreme Court's rulings generally adopt a protective approach towards the cargo owner.

Conclusion

In maritime law determining damagesis a fundamental principle that directly affects the carrier's liability and the cargo owner's right to compensation.

  • Damages are calculated based on the market value of the goods.
  • In case of loss, the full value of the item will be compensated; in case of damage, the difference in value between the intact and damaged items will be compensated.
  • Damages due to late delivery cannot exceed the freight cost (except in exceptional circumstances).
  • SDR limits apply, but are removed if a value declaration is made.
  • Supreme Court rulings interpret the carrier's duty of care broadly and protect the cargo owner.

In conclusion, accurate assessment of damages is a critical element in ensuring both safety in maritime transport and commercial stability between the parties.

 

Leave a Reply

Call Now Button