How to Appeal a Risk Assessment Report for a Building? Time Limits, Procedure, Petition, and Litigation Process under Law No. 6306

A comprehensive legal guide on the appeal period for risky building reports, appeal petitions, technical committee inspections, administrative lawsuits, stay of execution, eviction, and demolition processes.

---

What is an objection to a risky building report?

Appealing a risky building report is an administrative appeal process used by owners or their legal representatives against the designation of a building as a "risky building" under Law No. 6306 on the Transformation of Areas Under Disaster Risk. A risky building report is not merely a technical engineering assessment. Once this report is finalized, it has significant legal consequences for the building, including eviction, demolition, title deed annotations, decision-making processes for owners, sale of land shares, rental assistance, strengthening, or reconstruction.

Therefore, objecting to a risky building report is an extremely important legal safeguard for property owners to protect their property rights. The designation of a building as a risky structure directly affects the owner's right to use and benefit from their property. Since the demolition process may begin once the report is finalized, property owners must object to this report within the prescribed time limit and with concrete justifications.

The most common mistake in urban transformation projects is viewing the risky building report as merely a "technical report" and ignoring its legal consequences. However, the risky building report forms the basis of the administrative process. If no objection is filed within the prescribed time, or if the objection is rejected, the risky building assessment becomes final, and the administration can initiate the evacuation and demolition process. The Urban Transformation Presidency's statements regarding the risky building process also indicate that if no objection is filed against the risky building assessment, the assessment becomes final.

Who can object to a Risk Assessment Report for a Building?

The right to object to a risk assessment report generally belongs to the building owners and their legal representatives. An owner is the person listed in the land registry as the owner of an independent unit or share of the land. If the objection is to be made through a representative on behalf of the owner, the power of attorney must be suitable for this process. In practice, it is important that the power of attorney includes the authority to handle urban transformation procedures, administrative applications, objections, lawsuits, and follow up on necessary documents.

If the owner has passed away, the right to object can be exercised by the heirs. The Ministry's statements indicate that for owners listed as deceased in the MERNIS system and whose title deeds have not been transferred, if the heirs are known, notification should be sent to the heirs, and they should be granted the right to object to the risky building assessment process.

Tenants, business occupants, or those actually residing in the property cannot, as a rule, object to a risky building assessment as the owner. However, tenants may also be affected by the process in terms of eviction, lease agreements, business operations, relocation assistance, and usage rights. Therefore, although tenants cannot directly object to the risky building report as if they were the owner, they should seek legal support regarding eviction notices, lease agreements, deposits, relocation expenses, and any administrative assistance they may need.

In properties with title deeds based on land shares but without condominium ownership or easement rights, it is necessary to separately assess which person owns which building. If there is more than one building on a parcel, the risk assessment may yield different results for each building. The Ministry's statements indicate that if there is more than one building on a parcel, the land registry will only record the risk assessment for the buildings identified as risky, not for all buildings.

What is the time limit for appealing a risky building report?

The deadline for appealing a risky building report is the most critical issue in practice. This is because the deadline is short, and if missed, the report may become final. Currently, building owners or their legal representatives must appeal a risky building assessment within fifteen days of the relevant announcement and notification process. The Urban Transformation Directorate's statement regarding the risky building process indicates that building owners or their legal representatives can appeal to the Urban Transformation Directorate within fifteen days of the last day of the announcement made at the local administrative office.

When calculating the time period, only the date the report was prepared should not be considered. After the risky building report is prepared, the report is reviewed by the administration. If there are no deficiencies, a note indicating that the building is at risk is entered in the declarations section of the land registry, a report is posted on the building, the owners are notified, and it is announced in the relevant mukhtar's office. The objection period is calculated taking into account this notification and announcement period.

The Ministry's frequently asked questions also state that in processes such as objections and demolitions under Law No. 6306, the date of receipt under the Notification Law, not the date of posting, will be taken as the basis; and that objection petitions submitted by the building owner or their legal representatives and received by the relevant directorate within fifteen days of the completion of all notifications will be considered.

Therefore, property owners remaining passive with statements like "I haven't received separate notification yet," "I wasn't aware of the announcement from the local administrative office," or "I haven't seen the e-Government notification" can lead to serious loss of rights. The risky building designation, the report posted on the building, the local administrative office announcement, the e-Government notification, and the land registry records should be checked regularly.

Where can I appeal a Risky Building Report?

Objections to a risky building report to the Urban Transformation Directorate , or to the relevant administration if authority has been delegated. In practice, this authority is most often the Provincial Directorate of Environment, Urbanization and Climate Change or the Urban Transformation Directorate. In areas where authority has been delegated, it may also be possible to apply to the municipality or the relevant administration.

The objection must be made in writing. The petition must clearly state the property's block, parcel, and independent unit information, the date and number of the risky building report, the licensed organization that prepared the report, the identity and contact information of the objecting owner, the reasons for the objection, and the request. If the application is made through a representative, the power of attorney must be attached.

The objection letter should not be seen as merely a formal application. This letter forms the basis of the technical committee's review. Therefore, it must be prepared with strong legal and technical evidence. The shortcomings in the report should be concretely detailed; a general statement such as "we do not accept the report" should not suffice.

What points should be included in an appeal against a risky building report?

In an appeal against a risky building report, it must first be established that the person appealing is the owner or legal representative. Documents such as title deed registration, identity card photocopy, power of attorney, inheritance certificate, or other documents demonstrating representation authority should be attached to the appeal.

Secondly, the petition should explain in which aspects the risk assessment report for the building is flawed. Technical objections can be raised under the following headings:

It can be argued that the risk assessment report does not evaluate the entire load-bearing system of the building, that the sampled columns or reinforced concrete elements do not represent the overall condition of the building, that the concrete strength tests were misinterpreted, that the reinforcement measurements were insufficient, that the effect of the soil was not adequately assessed, and that the age of the building, its usage status, and existing renovations were not taken into consideration.

Furthermore, any errors in the address, building code, plot number, independent unit, or owner information in the report should be clearly stated. This is because the risky building report is important not only for its technical calculations but also for whether it accurately describes the property.

Thirdly, the petition should address procedural objections. For example, it should be examined whether the organization conducting the assessment is authorized, whether the report was prepared in accordance with the legislation, whether the notifications to the property owners were properly made, whether the report was prepared with incomplete documents, and whether the objection period was correctly initiated.

Finally, the petition must contain a clear request. The request should state that the risky building report be re-examined by a technical committee, that any deficiencies in the report be rectified, that an on-site inspection be conducted if necessary, and that the determination that the building is risky be removed.

What documents should be included when appealing a Risky Building Report?

The appeal against the risky building report should be supported with as much strong evidence as possible. Generally, the following documents are important:

Required documents include: land registry records, photocopy of owner's ID, power of attorney, inheritance certificate, risk assessment report, notification or announcement documents, building permit, occupancy permit, architectural project, structural project, previous reinforcement reports, special technical reports, photographs, municipal documents, numbering documents, and any previous building inspection or engineering reviews.

If objections are to be raised, especially on technical grounds, it may be beneficial to obtain a technical opinion prepared by an independent civil engineer, structural engineer, or academic expert. The technical opinion will detail any calculation errors, missing sampling methods, or problems in the structural system assessment mentioned in the report.

However, a technical opinion alone does not override the official risk assessment report. This opinion is used to strengthen the objection and draw the technical committee's attention to specific points. The final assessment is made by an authorized technical committee within the scope of the legislation.

How is a Technical Team Review Conducted?

If an objection is filed against the risky building report within the prescribed time limit and by an authorized person, the objection will be examined by a technical committee. The technical committee will evaluate whether the risky building assessment report has been prepared in accordance with legislation, technical principles, and scientific data. It is accepted that the objection is not limited only to the reasons stated in the petition, and that the technical integrity of the report may be examined.

During the technical committee's review, the report's structural system analysis, concrete and reinforcement data, number of samples, representativeness of sampling locations, soil effects, building class, building geometry, calculation method used, and report appendices are evaluated. If necessary, the institution that prepared the report may be requested to correct any deficiencies. In some cases, an on-site inspection is also possible.

If the technical committee finds the objection justified, the risky building designation will be revoked or the report will be amended. If the objection is rejected, the risky building designation becomes final, and the evacuation and demolition process continues. The owners' right to file an annulment lawsuit in administrative courts after this stage should also be considered.

What to do if the appeal is rejected?

If an appeal against the risky building report is rejected, the determination of the building as risky becomes final. However, this does not mean that the owner has no legal recourse left. Since the determination of a building as risky is an administrative act, an annulment lawsuit can be filed against this act in the administrative court.

The time limit for filing a lawsuit against administrative actions under Law No. 6306 is generally thirty days. This period should be calculated taking into account the notification, announcement, technical committee decision, and finalization process in the specific case. Calculating the time limit is crucial because missing the deadline makes it more difficult to pursue the annulment of the administrative action.

In an administrative lawsuit, it is not sufficient to simply state that "the report is flawed." The reasons why the risk assessment of the building is unlawful from a technical and legal standpoint must be explained in detail. Technical deficiencies in the report, irregularities in notification, issues of authority, errors in building code and address, incomplete inspection, errors in sampling, deficiencies in soil assessment, and the principle of disproportionality must all be presented together.

Will Filing a Lawsuit Automatically Stop the Demolition?

Filing a lawsuit against a risky building report does not automatically halt the evacuation and demolition process. This is very important in practice. The Ministry's frequently asked questions clearly state that if a lawsuit is filed seeking a stay of execution or annulment of a risky building assessment or demolition decision, the mere filing of a lawsuit does not prevent the administrative process from proceeding unless a stay of execution or annulment decision is granted.

Therefore, in most cases, a stay of execution should be requested when filing a lawsuit against a risky building report. The request for a stay of execution must be supported by the arguments that the report is clearly unlawful and that its implementation would cause irreparable or irreversible harm.

For example, issues such as the fact that a subsequent cancellation decision would be effectively ineffective if the building were demolished, that property rights would be irreversibly affected, that there are serious technical deficiencies in the report, that the owners were not properly notified, or that the report pertains to an erroneous property, may be important in a request for a stay of execution.

Is it possible to file a lawsuit directly without first objecting to the Risky Building Report?

The right to appeal against a risky building report through administrative means is an important safeguard. However, depending on the specifics of the case, direct administrative litigation may also be considered. Nevertheless, in practice, using the administrative appeal route first is strategically beneficial in most cases, as it allows for a technical committee review.

Filing an appeal allows for the correction of technical errors in the report at the administrative stage. Furthermore, the technical committee's decision could be an important consideration in any subsequent lawsuit. However, since the timeframes are very short, property owners need to consider both the appeal and lawsuit deadlines together.

The biggest risk here is missing the deadline for filing a lawsuit due to the assumption that an objection has been filed. Therefore, the technical committee's decision, the date of notification, the date the risky building assessment becomes final, and the lawsuit filing period should all be calculated together.

The Strongest Legal Grounds for Appealing a Risky Building Report

The strongest grounds for objecting to a risky building report are concrete and verifiable ones. Instead of general statements, focus should be placed on specific points of the report.

The first strong objection is that the technical review was incomplete. The failure to evaluate the entire load-bearing system of the building, the limited number of column samples taken, the fact that the samples did not represent the building, or the disregard for existing reinforcement/renovation status are significant grounds for objection.

The second strong reason is that the report was not prepared in accordance with the regulations. Risk assessment of buildings must be carried out by an authorized and licensed organization in accordance with the relevant technical principles. The authorization of the organization conducting the assessment, the format of the report, any missing signatures, the presence of appendices, and electronic system records should be examined.

A third strong reason is the incorrect identification of the property. Errors in the island, parcel, building code, address, independent unit, owner, or block information can render the legal validity of the report questionable. Especially if there is more than one building on the same parcel, it must be clearly stated which building has been identified as a risky structure.

The fourth strong ground is irregularities in the notification and communication process. Failure to properly notify the owners, failure to serve notice to the heirs, failure to conduct the announcement in accordance with the procedure, or incorrect commencement of the time period are significant factors in the objection and litigation process.

The fifth strong reason is that the possibility of strengthening the building has not been considered at all. While demolition is the primary option once a risky building is definitively identified, strengthening may be technically possible in some structures. The Ministry's statements indicate that if strengthening is preferred over demolition of a risky building, it is necessary to have the feasibility of strengthening determined within the given timeframes, obtain a decision with the required majority under Article 19 of the Condominium Law, prepare a strengthening project, and obtain a permit.

What happens if the Risky Building Report is not challenged?

If no objection is filed within the specified time against the risky building report, the determination of the building as risky becomes final. Following this finalization, the evacuation and demolition process begins. At this stage, owners are given a period of time to evacuate and demolish the building. If evacuation and demolition do not occur within the given time, the authorities may take action such as suspending electricity, water, and natural gas services, and carrying out evacuation and demolition with the support of law enforcement.

Once a building is definitively deemed at risk, the decision-making process among the owners becomes crucial. After the building is demolished, the property becomes a land plot, and stages such as reconstruction, construction contracts in exchange for apartments, contractor selection, land share sharing, distribution of independent units, and the sale of shares belonging to owners who did not participate in the decision come into play.

Therefore, the decision on whether or not to appeal the risky building report should be made quickly, consciously, and based on technical and legal review. While not appealing the report at all does not mean acceptance of the entire process later on, it may weaken the owner's legal position.

Mistakes Made When Preparing an Appeal Letter Against a Risky Building Report

The most common mistake in practice is preparing objection letters that are too short and lack justification. Letters stating, "Our building is sound, we object to the report," often do not have the desired effect. Objections should be directed at specific sections of the technical report and be concretized.

The second mistake is the incorrect calculation of the time periods. Property owners sometimes act based on the date of the report, sometimes on the date of the title deed annotation, and sometimes on the date of actual knowledge of the situation. However, the objection period should be carefully calculated according to the notification and announcement procedure stipulated in the legislation.

The third mistake is objections made by non-owners. A tenant, building manager, actual user, or neighbor may not be able to directly exercise their right to object if they do not have ownership status. The objection must be made by the owner, legal representative, heir, or authorized agent.

The fourth mistake is the failure to seek technical support. Since the risky building report is a technical report, concrete objections must be developed regarding civil engineering, structural safety, reinforced concrete analysis, soil, and the load-bearing system in order for the objection to be strong.

The fifth mistake is neglecting the administrative litigation process. When an appeal is rejected, property owners need to quickly consider the option of filing an administrative lawsuit and obtaining a stay of execution. Otherwise, the demolition process may proceed.

The Role of a Lawyer in Appealing a Risky Building Report

In the process of appealing a risky building report, the lawyer's role is not limited to writing the petition. From the beginning of the process, the lawyer evaluates the land registry records, owner lists, notifications, announcements, the administrative basis of the report, the duration of the lawsuit, and any legal deficiencies in the technical report. Furthermore, working with technical experts, the lawyer ensures that any concrete errors in the report are accurately reflected in the petition.

In urban transformation processes, procedural errors, delays, or incomplete applications can have serious consequences. Therefore, it is important to seek legal support, especially in apartment buildings with multiple owners, properties with disputes among heirs, jointly owned plots, plots with multiple buildings, commercial properties, or cases where pressure from contractors is present.

The lawyer also strategically plans the subsequent stages if the appeal is rejected, including administrative litigation, applications for stay of execution, appeals against eviction and demolition procedures, strengthening options, property owners' decisions, contractor contracts, and land share sales.

Conclusion

Appealing a risk assessment report is one of the most important legal rights of property owners in the urban transformation process. This appeal is not merely an application regarding the technical condition of the building; it is a critical legal step that directly affects property rights, the eviction and demolition process, land registry records, the economic interests of the owners, and future urban transformation projects.

Since the appeal period against the risky building report is short, property owners should not remain passive. As soon as the report is received, the land registry records, notification documents, the risky building assessment report, technical calculations, building projects, and owner information should be examined. The appeal letter should be prepared with technical and legal justifications, not with general statements.

If the appeal is rejected, an annulment lawsuit and a request for a stay of execution may be filed in administrative courts. However, since filing a lawsuit alone will not stop the eviction and demolition process, the request for a stay of execution must be supported by concrete and strong grounds.

A well-prepared objection letter to a risky building report can help reveal errors in the report during the technical committee's inspection. Conversely, an objection filed after the deadline, without justification, or by an unauthorized person can lead to serious loss of rights for the property owner. Therefore, the objection process to a risky building report is a strategic urban transformation phase that must be conducted professionally, both technically and legally.